bundybastard
Administrator 
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 2:15:56 GMT
At the moment Im pretty much set on reducing the CY period from 5 years back to the original 4 Season period, don't get why it was originally changed but 5 Seasons is way too long. This would kick in immediately however it would only currently affect those who just reset their CY this offseason, so for example those who have been under 42 wins or the missed the playoffs the past couple of Seasons still have 3 Seasons to avoid it, those who this Season reached 42 wins or the playoffs fall into this new adjustment.
If you guys have any other ideas Im open to hearing them, but you have till the end of the playoffs to make your case.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 3, 2015 2:17:24 GMT
As president of the union, I agree with this, however, I'd like to get a consensus from the GMs.
I think 5 years is away too long.
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Aug 3, 2015 2:20:47 GMT
figure this would make it more interesting. but we also do have those influx of GMs on waiting list than when we need them we dont have any GMs but i'm down. especially since teams without CY reset this year get grandfather by he old 5 seasons
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrenegade on Aug 3, 2015 2:23:05 GMT
i like the idea of instead of getting fired maybe you just lose a few draft spots or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Aug 3, 2015 2:24:40 GMT
Sounds good
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 2:32:08 GMT
i like the idea of instead of getting fired maybe you just lose a few draft spots or something. Your fired and only have to sit out a Season, can join the WL after that |
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Aug 3, 2015 2:38:54 GMT
Players shouldn't be contracted if you get fired.
I've never understaood the point in that.
|
|
|
|
Post by traves on Aug 3, 2015 2:48:14 GMT
Interesting that it was 5. Have many people actually not made the 5 before?
|
|
|
|
Post by springs on Aug 3, 2015 3:45:30 GMT
I liked the 4 year better. It makes it harder to super-tank since that CY season is coming up quick. Getting fired after CY was a nice little break as well. Nothing wrong with a little firing once in a while.
|
|
BANNAK
Moderator 
Posts: 5,210 
Staff Member
|
Post by BANNAK on Aug 3, 2015 3:58:47 GMT
Agreed.
Wouldn't be against setting 42 wins as the benchmark either, regardless of playoffs. I've seen some GMs get fired going 41-41 because they were in a tough conference, and other GMs stay even though they were 5 or 6 games under .500 in a shit conference.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingalexander on Aug 3, 2015 4:09:12 GMT
So if we change it .... it would go from 5 years to 4 years after cy restart... but the teams that haven't been restarted still have the original 5 seasons ?
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 4:11:45 GMT
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 3, 2015 4:24:44 GMT
Agreed. Wouldn't be against setting 42 wins as the benchmark either, regardless of playoffs. I've seen some GMs get fired going 41-41 because they were in a tough conference, and other GMs stay even though they were 5 or 6 games under .500 in a shit conference. my 76ers and this current Sonics team are great examples of both of those things |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 3, 2015 4:25:05 GMT
and ya 4 is better
|
|
|
|
Post by kingalexander on Aug 3, 2015 4:41:00 GMT
I'm in favor .... rabble rabble rabble
|
|
|
|
Post by mrclubz on Aug 3, 2015 18:16:15 GMT
Agreed.
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Aug 3, 2015 18:21:33 GMT
No complaints here
|
|
|
|
Post by nyybaseball on Aug 3, 2015 18:23:24 GMT
Should go back to 4 but no expansion draft imo
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Aug 3, 2015 18:32:35 GMT
I'd say give the replacement GM two options:
1) Do an expansion draft
or
2) Get one amnesty and keep the team
If there isn't a new GM, then just default to expansion draft
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Aug 6, 2015 3:46:51 GMT
I still think we need to implement a voting committee for this, Because sometimes with injuries/pure bad luck some people hit CY when they actually have a solid team.
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Aug 6, 2015 3:57:39 GMT
I still think we need to implement a voting committee for this, Because sometimes with injuries/pure bad luck some people hit CY when they actually have a solid team. Waaaaaaaah |
|
|
|
Post by ucrenegade on Aug 6, 2015 4:11:02 GMT
while were at it ban tanking that is just stupid man up and beat the other guy fairly
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 6, 2015 4:15:30 GMT
I still think we need to implement a voting committee for this, Because sometimes with injuries/pure bad luck some people hit CY when they actually have a solid team. that's stupid, a majority of people will just vote for the team to not go through CY out of sympathy for the team unless that team was such shit that they probably would have been fired anyways because they were shit. Have you seen all of the teams that get bailed out of HC year after year? It's you win 42 games, make the playoffs or your out of the league. Some people want to take it even further because the west is so shit which I'm not against. |
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Aug 6, 2015 4:16:04 GMT
I still think we need to implement a voting committee for this, Because sometimes with injuries/pure bad luck some people hit CY when they actually have a solid team. that's stupid, a majority of people will just vote for the team to not go through CY out of sympathy for the team unless that team was such shit that they probably would have been fired anyways because they were shit. Have you seen all of the teams that get bailed out of HC year after year? It's you win 42 games, make the playoffs or your out of the league. Some people want to take it even further because the west is so shit which I'm not against. Certain teams didnt deserve to get fired that did. |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 6, 2015 4:17:30 GMT
while were at it ban tanking that is just stupid man up and beat the other guy fairly if that were a rule, there would be no league. You have to hit the bottom at some point, good players only stay good for so long. |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 6, 2015 4:18:06 GMT
that's stupid, a majority of people will just vote for the team to not go through CY out of sympathy for the team unless that team was such shit that they probably would have been fired anyways because they were shit. Have you seen all of the teams that get bailed out of HC year after year? It's you win 42 games, make the playoffs or your out of the league. Some people want to take it even further because the west is so shit which I'm not against. Certain teams didnt deserve to get fired that did. like who? |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Aug 6, 2015 4:18:43 GMT
and please oh god don't say you
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Aug 6, 2015 4:19:37 GMT
Springs had that one year where for some reason his team didn't win
and yes I had a very good team that couldn't win games
|
|
|
|
Post by springs on Aug 6, 2015 4:19:49 GMT
I didn't deserve to be fired
I deserved far, far worse
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrenegade on Aug 6, 2015 4:20:18 GMT
while were at it ban tanking that is just stupid man up and beat the other guy fairly if that were a rule, there would be no league. You have to hit the bottom at some point, good players only stay good for so long. that is what gming a team is all about though. good teams dynasty teams are because they 1 no how to deal with the cap and 2 know how to develop players to take over after the other ones get old. Look at spurs that is one of the best run teams ever |
|
