bundybastard
Administrator 
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 2:29:50 GMT
From now If a pick is being submitted in a trade with a protection on it but not being listed as being owed the teams next years 1st unprotected then you will lose the pick originally owed next year.
Basically saying your not automatically owed the next yr 1st like before, you need to have an understanding between both GMs involved and the simmer trading it in. This kicks in this Season, previous or already submitted protected picks fall into the previous rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Aug 3, 2015 2:55:14 GMT
reasoning for this?
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 3, 2015 2:56:48 GMT
Can you show us an example?
This explanation is a bit confusing.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 2:57:53 GMT
So they are submitted correctly, it's the same shit as before, just needs to be confirmed by both GMs, saves confusion down the track
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Aug 3, 2015 3:00:36 GMT
Grizz trade lotto protected 2042 1st rounder to Bulls
Grizz finish within the lotto
Grizz keeps pick, Bulls receive nothing.
Bulls receive nothing because it wasnt listed that Bulls receive Grizz 2043 1st unprotected if Grizz keep 2042 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by bloop on Aug 3, 2015 3:02:13 GMT
Grizz trade lotto protected 2042 1st rounder to Bulls Grizz finish within the lotto Grizz keeps pick, Bulls receive nothing. Bulls receive nothing because it wasnt listed that Bulls receive Grizz 2043 1st unprotected if Grizz keep 2042 1st Grizz are cheaters |
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Aug 3, 2015 3:03:22 GMT
yeah i thought it was assumed u get a pick. idt any gm will trade for a lotto protected pick if they get nothing in the future knowing the team will be in lotto.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 3, 2015 3:06:32 GMT
The issue is that teams are dealing protected picks and then dealing their 1st the following year.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Aug 3, 2015 3:11:39 GMT
The issue is that teams are dealing protected picks and then dealing their 1st the following year. well those folk are retarted |
|
|
|
Post by mrclubz on Aug 3, 2015 15:33:19 GMT
The issue is that teams are dealing protected picks and then dealing their 1st the following year. well those folk are retarted how is that their fault thought? The person taking a chance on a protected pick should include the unprotected for the following year which should be included in the trade. |
|
