|
|
Post by aar on Jun 15, 2015 15:54:06 GMT
Get rid of potential in scouting: Giving away a player's potential makes drafts a lot less interesting and hurts the end of the 1st round. It would be great to see the occasional late 1st round stud, but having their potential available to scout takes away a lot of intrigue about certain players. Potential should always be the one big secret in any sim league.
|
|
basenoc
Moderator 
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 7,679 
Staff Member
|
Post by basenoc on Jun 15, 2015 22:27:29 GMT
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by guins on Jun 17, 2015 18:03:40 GMT
voted
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jun 18, 2015 0:29:21 GMT
Tied.
Need a deciding vote or I decide
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jun 18, 2015 2:17:09 GMT
Declined.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator 
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Jun 18, 2015 13:07:30 GMT
Reopened this, too close to tell. If I was voting Id be voting yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by nyybaseball on Jun 18, 2015 16:28:08 GMT
Yeah I feel like this is a risk you take through the draft. Teams IRL don't know potentials they can only guess. This is the best idea to me
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Jun 18, 2015 23:00:14 GMT
I voted no
|
|
|
|
Post by mrclubz on Jun 18, 2015 23:04:06 GMT
I voted yes. every team should of voted for this. this is something pretty serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by getbeard on Jun 18, 2015 23:21:13 GMT
bad teams will stay bad forever if they can't scout, not all GM's are created equal and getting lucky in the draft is one of the only ways lesser GMs can become established teams early in there GMing days IMO. Plus IRL scouts spend months and years looking at players trying to determine that players potential, where we often have a day if that in this league to figure out who we want to draft, so the real life comparison is a little skewed in this situation, also IMO.
|
|
