shorty
Administrator 
Administrator
Posts: 15,223 
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Apr 21, 2015 1:12:29 GMT
- Knicks forfeit their next 1st round pick - Rick Barry will go on waivers for $500 (goes to league bank) effective immediately. SuperMaor23 |
|
|
|
Post by blue on Apr 21, 2015 1:21:42 GMT
The $500 goes to the Knicks franchise or just oblivion?
|
|
|
|
Post by nyybaseball on Apr 21, 2015 1:22:29 GMT
Holy shit he's fucked. Hopefully he doesn't quit
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Apr 21, 2015 1:22:45 GMT
The $500 goes to the Knicks franchise or just oblivion? |
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Apr 21, 2015 1:33:01 GMT
Meh just fire him then, id say if you penalize him he will eventually quit anyways and I highly doubt we'll find a new GM willing to take over a team after the HC penalty
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Apr 21, 2015 1:34:14 GMT
Btw shorty super is no where near as annoying as boogie
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Apr 21, 2015 1:38:39 GMT
Btw shorty super is no where near as annoying as boogie Well I'm okay with either or. Up to you. It'll be better off the Knicks if they don't this penalty, but we don't have any GMs lined up to take over either. |
|
|
|
Post by nyybaseball on Apr 21, 2015 1:39:15 GMT
Don't fire him just lift the penalty if he quits
|
|
|
|
Post by nyybaseball on Apr 21, 2015 1:40:37 GMT
At least he's active we need to keep the active gm's.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Apr 21, 2015 1:43:20 GMT
if anything just leave it at no FA priv for 2 season
|
|
|
|
Post by rookieoftheyear on Apr 21, 2015 1:47:44 GMT
Let him keep Barry, but No FA sounds good
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Apr 21, 2015 2:10:26 GMT
if anything just leave it at no FA priv for 2 season Let him keep Barry, but No FA sounds good Tesm should still lose Barry regardless, that's the staple of this penalty. FA doesn't matter much his season cause he'd be close of not over SC already but still should happen for both seasons. If anything let him keep his next first, since he's basically losing the 3 he traded for Barry. But if he quits, should lift all but Barry. |
|
tyfreak
Administrator
Indiana Pacers
Posts: 12,962
Staff Member
|
Post by tyfreak on Apr 21, 2015 2:15:43 GMT
What about he pays 500, loses first and can't use MLE/LLE but can offer mins
|
|
|
|
Post by swish on Apr 21, 2015 3:02:42 GMT
wow steep punishments lol
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Apr 21, 2015 3:14:24 GMT
Let me lose the pick and FA but keep barry and his birds and ill stay and contend
|
|
|
|
Post by popnfresh on Apr 21, 2015 3:18:10 GMT
Let me lose the pick and FA but keep barry and his birds and ill stay and contend The point is to hurt your team from contending. Not take away a shitty late first and an MLE and leave you in the same position for contention. |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 21, 2015 4:48:58 GMT
penalties should be layered for every 24 hours their over
first 48 hours, lost FA privileges draft pick
next 24 lost star player
next 24 if still over or go back over next best player
next 24 fired
just a thought
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Apr 21, 2015 5:16:20 GMT
penalties should be layered for every 24 hours their over first 48 hours, lost FA privileges draft pick next 24 lost star player next 24 if still over or go back over next best player next 24 fired just a thought Actually like this idea. But like popnfresh said, teams should get penalized and FA and draft picks for the Knicks right now mean nothing. Losing te best player first creates a sense of urgency, especially with contending teams having meh draft picks and stars under contract already |
|
|
|
Post by bloop on Apr 21, 2015 5:23:18 GMT
penalties should be layered for every 24 hours their over first 48 hours, lost FA privileges draft pick next 24 lost star player next 24 if still over or go back over next best player next 24 fired just a thought Actually like this idea. But like popnfresh said, teams should get penalized and FA and draft picks for the Knicks right now mean nothing. Losing te best player first creates a sense of urgency, especially with contending teams having meh draft picks and stars under contract already 24 is awhile imo but like the tiered approach |
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 21, 2015 5:25:49 GMT
believe me, if I was running this thing (and I was using an HC), Rick Barry wouldn't be the 1st star gone because of HC problems. But I understand there's also people that don't want to completely fuck over a team just because said team is 200k over.
Just figured that would appease both sides
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Apr 21, 2015 14:57:44 GMT
I just followed the CBA with this decision, and the reasons I heard from Super were pretty weak. With how easy it is to get under HC, I'm fine with bringing the hammer down on someone who finally violated it.
And Super keeps telling me to do this and do that. I don't think he understands that this is not up to him to decide.
If Bundy doesn't step in and alter this decision, I'm fine sticking with it because there's just too much gray area right now and I don't know how to deal with that. There's been a lot of good suggestions, but all of them are bit different.
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Apr 21, 2015 16:20:00 GMT
Lmfao who tells the admins how he should be penalized?
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Apr 21, 2015 22:27:57 GMT
I just followed the CBA with this decision, and the reasons I heard from Super were pretty weak. With how easy it is to get under HC, I'm fine with bringing the hammer down on someone who finally violated it. And Super keeps telling me to do this and do that. I don't think he understands that this is not up to him to decide. If Bundy doesn't step in and alter this decision, I'm fine sticking with it because there's just too much gray area right now and I don't know how to deal with that. There's been a lot of good suggestions, but all of them are bit different. Lmfao who tells the admins how he should be penalized? maybe wait until the 24 hour clock for the Barry waiver is through? figure a SIM wouldn't be too shortly after and Barry would be a big swing to whoever gets him is supposed to get him |
|
basenoc
Moderator 
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 7,679
Staff Member
|
Post by basenoc on Apr 21, 2015 23:15:49 GMT
penalties should be layered for every 24 hours their over first 48 hours, lost FA privileges draft pick next 24 lost star player next 24 if still over or go back over next best player next 24 fired just a thought I like this, but make it best player IR'd plus lost of draft picks 1st. Then FA privileges. Then 2nd best player and then fired. |
|
|
|
Post by rookieoftheyear on Apr 21, 2015 23:19:15 GMT
IR Barry
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Apr 22, 2015 2:30:00 GMT
Can someone tell me whats going on with this? And by someone I mean an actual admin/simmer and not blue who needs to stop butting in
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Apr 22, 2015 2:30:23 GMT
Just get this shit over with already so I can adjust my DC and win a championship already.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Apr 22, 2015 2:32:18 GMT
Can someone tell me whats going on with this? And by someone I mean an actual admin/simmer and not blue who needs to stop butting in blue has something up her cunt it seems |
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Apr 22, 2015 2:33:28 GMT
Can someone tell me whats going on with this? And by someone I mean an actual admin/simmer and not blue who needs to stop butting in blue has something up her cunt it seems No bullshit he seriously has something up his ass with me, ever since I didn't trade him wimberg |
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Apr 22, 2015 3:52:26 GMT
shorty I'd like some clarification on the free agency, can I atleast resign my own guys? Because if not thats kinda bullshit to be honest.
|
|
