bundybastard
Administrator 
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 18, 2014 22:53:48 GMT
Seriously considering removing RFA, vote so we can decide aye
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 18, 2014 23:01:13 GMT
Option 2 is technically a no fellas
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Nov 18, 2014 23:09:48 GMT
with so much young talent I need to keep rfa lol.... shuld just make stakes higher. like if said player is all start must match with protected draft pick. if said player is average as fuck. 500 cash ect. idk who would be judge but for me to keep a guy like raines i would have to move something more weighted ifhe decided not to resing
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2014 23:11:34 GMT
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2014 23:12:07 GMT
Can't wait to lose wilt!!
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Nov 18, 2014 23:13:53 GMT
removing it essentially gaurentees you losingyour young player if he doesnt initially resign lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2014 23:16:20 GMT
So let's say supermoar signs Jerry West, this improves activity how?
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Nov 18, 2014 23:22:33 GMT
Can't wait to lose wilt!! just let me know when your ready to lose him |
|
tyfreak
Administrator
Indiana Pacers
Posts: 12,962 
Staff Member
|
Post by tyfreak on Nov 18, 2014 23:34:26 GMT
Make it go in about 5-6 years.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 20, 2014 11:40:23 GMT
Bump
|
|
basenoc
Moderator 
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 7,679
Staff Member
|
Post by basenoc on Nov 20, 2014 13:09:06 GMT
Scrap it
|
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Nov 20, 2014 17:37:50 GMT
Eh. I went with option 2 lol.
|
|
itnas123
Administrator
Charlotte Bobcats
Posts: 25,496
Staff Member
|
Post by itnas123 on Nov 20, 2014 17:44:27 GMT
Eh. I went with option 2 lol. Same here. |
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Nov 20, 2014 18:56:42 GMT
Voted 1, I dont know about the outta here part but I like it.
Dont understand how letting guys walk helps activity.
I think it's just the opposite.
Instead of having no salaries to max guys it makes to more important to trade for them I'd think.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 20, 2014 19:55:45 GMT
The thing Im not big on is that your basically guaranteed to keep the player on a 9 year contract
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2014 20:19:33 GMT
Get rid of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Nov 20, 2014 21:04:06 GMT
Keep it or modify it. Don't get rid of it.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 20, 2014 22:51:08 GMT
I can start bringing draft prospects in younger and rawer I guess
|
|
|
|
Post by ballislife on Nov 20, 2014 22:54:43 GMT
Could perhaps make RFA contracts shorter, like a 2yr max or something
|
|
|
|
Post by BrazilianDude on Nov 20, 2014 23:31:23 GMT
I can start bringing draft prospects in younger and rawer I guess Wouldn't mind that. Past few classes have had several rookies come in as allstars. That should be once every few years. Development by a GM should matter |
|
shorty
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15,223
Staff Member
|
Post by shorty on Nov 21, 2014 0:21:13 GMT
Here's something I thought of that's inspired by the contract extension feature in the last league.
What if for RFAs, the star players will have a arbitrary happiness rating (decided by Bundy if he's up to it), that'll say how happy the player is with the franchise he's currently on. Maybe the player will demand a trade, or threaten to lower his potential by 20 if he's still stuck with the franchise after FA. So that way, a team can still retain their talent, but they'd need to do a good job of surrounding their players with a plan and a good future.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 21, 2014 0:30:40 GMT
Naa don't really want a feature thats heavily influenced by a Commishes decision, shortys idea will only cause issues, not saying its a bad idea though.
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 21, 2014 0:32:20 GMT
Could perhaps make RFA contracts shorter, like a 2yr max or something Meh would be weird having a rule like that though |
|
|
|
Post by entrapy on Nov 21, 2014 0:36:11 GMT
You have to pay a first to RFA. That's a steep enough price imo if you want to keep it
|
|
bundybastard
Administrator
Co Commish
Posts: 15,661
Staff Member
|
Post by bundybastard on Nov 21, 2014 0:36:20 GMT
Maybe just have a team option for the 5th and 6th years...
with the salaries for the 5th/6th yr being based on where the player was selected in the draft...
Top 5 - max
6 - 13 10,0000/11,000
14 - 20 7,500,000/8,500,000
21 - 29 5,000,000/6,000,000
|
|
|
|
Post by entrapy on Nov 21, 2014 0:37:33 GMT
Wouldn't that be almost like the two year max suggestion?
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Nov 21, 2014 0:54:25 GMT
So let's say supermoar signs Jerry West, this improves activity how? You talk way too much shit for someone who hasnt done anything in this league man. |
|
tyfreak
Administrator
Indiana Pacers
Posts: 12,962
Staff Member
|
Post by tyfreak on Nov 21, 2014 1:11:17 GMT
I don't think we should touch RFA tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2014 1:57:16 GMT
I like the idea of if the player signs with another team, that the original team can get the player back, but the contract cut down to two years.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperMaor23 on Nov 21, 2014 3:47:02 GMT
If we get rid of RFA we need some sort of mid season extension, a team can fall apart after a big time player walks. Happened to me with Dwight, if I didnt have Stone waiting on the bench I would Have been fucked.
|
|
