Post by daedalus on Mar 20, 2014 20:54:21 GMT
TEAM DAEDAMETRICS
Leading off this edition of Daedametrics is the Power Rankings. Formula is derived simply by calculating the difference between Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating. Higher score the better.
Rockets are the cream of the crop using this method and by a decent margin. Should be interesting to compare this to the EWP table below. The other end of the spectrum looks like a two horse race: The Pistons and 76ers are statistically far worse than any other team in the league.
Using the above here is the "Playoff Simulation":
The Expected Win Percentage table (EWP) predicts winning percentages via Points for and Points against.
The tops of both conferences look very strong however the bottom end of the East looks to have playoff teams with losing records which is never a good indicator of parity.
Next up is the Team Metrics with Possessions, Offensive Rating, Defensive Rating, True Shooting Percentage, Effective Field Goal Percentage, and Rebounding Percentage listed at the top of the table. The top/bottom three of each category are listed at the bottom of the table.
Don't mess with the Chuck. The Rockets and Nugget's are scary good in both TS% and eFG%.
The pretty chart has made a comeback! Unfortunately we are back to diamonds until I can figure out why the team logos were being assigned incorrectly.
PLAYER DAEDAMETRICS
Kicking off the Player edition of Daedametrics is the individual leaders for each category:
Individual leaders are nice. Team leaders are even better. Enjoy:
And now presenting the "Team Daeda" awards for the 2008 NBA Regular Season.
Your eyes do not deceive you. Magloire is the #1 PER rated Center in the league and top 10 in rebounding percentage. He won this award wire to wire. He led at the All-Star break and carried it to the end of the season. The above GIF is still appropriate.
Congratulations to all the players receiving accolades!
Leading off this edition of Daedametrics is the Power Rankings. Formula is derived simply by calculating the difference between Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating. Higher score the better.
Rockets are the cream of the crop using this method and by a decent margin. Should be interesting to compare this to the EWP table below. The other end of the spectrum looks like a two horse race: The Pistons and 76ers are statistically far worse than any other team in the league.
Using the above here is the "Playoff Simulation":
The Expected Win Percentage table (EWP) predicts winning percentages via Points for and Points against.
The tops of both conferences look very strong however the bottom end of the East looks to have playoff teams with losing records which is never a good indicator of parity.
Next up is the Team Metrics with Possessions, Offensive Rating, Defensive Rating, True Shooting Percentage, Effective Field Goal Percentage, and Rebounding Percentage listed at the top of the table. The top/bottom three of each category are listed at the bottom of the table.
Don't mess with the Chuck. The Rockets and Nugget's are scary good in both TS% and eFG%.
The pretty chart has made a comeback! Unfortunately we are back to diamonds until I can figure out why the team logos were being assigned incorrectly.
PLAYER DAEDAMETRICS
Kicking off the Player edition of Daedametrics is the individual leaders for each category:
Individual leaders are nice. Team leaders are even better. Enjoy:
And now presenting the "Team Daeda" awards for the 2008 NBA Regular Season.
Your eyes do not deceive you. Magloire is the #1 PER rated Center in the league and top 10 in rebounding percentage. He won this award wire to wire. He led at the All-Star break and carried it to the end of the season. The above GIF is still appropriate.
Congratulations to all the players receiving accolades!
